Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. George Tatum, III

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 20, 1993No. 92-2232PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant George Tatum, III, challenges the district court’s reimposition of a term of supervised release following revocation of his original term of supervised release. We join the majority of circuits that have addressed this issue and hold that upon revocation of a term of supervised release, a district court is without statutory authority to impose both imprisonment and another term of supervised release.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

George Tatum, III, pled guilty to one count of an indictment charging him with two counts of theft of mail by a postal employee in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1709.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Behrooz K. BehnezhadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Timothy Tyrone RockwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Charles David SchraderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Raynell HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. James L. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. Jason M. MoriartyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Shaun K. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Gonzalo De Jesus TamayoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Darrell B. GreshamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API