Southeastern Alaska Mining Corp. v. Zavodsky
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES, District Judge.
The decree appealed from provides for the foreclosure of an alleged lien claimed on account of services performed by Frank Fremming in and about certain mining -claims and property belonging to appellant. Subsequent' to the entry of the decree, Fremming assigned the benefits of his judgment to appellee, .Zavodsky, who was duly substituted as party plaintiff.
No question has been made as to the amount that became due to Fremming, and appellant’s counsel states in his brief that the sole question presented is as to whether plaintiff ‘ brought himself within the provisions…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davis v. AlvordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Mining Co. v. CullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Lockhart v. RollinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1889
- Pioneer Mining Co. v. DelamotteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
- Loisel v. MortimerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- D.H. Blattner & Sons, Inc. v. N.M. Rothschild & Sons, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939