Legal Opinion

Dimos v. Stowe

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 16, 1952No. Record 3891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

In January, 1950, A. W. Stowe filed a notice of motion for judgment against Louis C. Dimos, seeking to recover $1,365, with interest thereon from August 30, 1949, until paid. This sum represented the purchase price of one De Humatic cooling unit alleged to have been sold by Stowe to Dimos.

To the notice of motion for judgment Dimos filed an answer denying that he was indebted to Stowe in any amount, contending ‘ ‘ That the De Humatic cooling unit was installed on trial and proved to be unsatisfactory and plaintiff was notified to that effect and was requested to remove the same, but has…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Machine Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Boothby v. ScalesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. House v. BeakIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Taylor v. Sutherlin-Meade Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1908
  5. Southern Gas & Gasoline Engine Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Acordia of Virginia Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Genito Glenn, L.P.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  2. Harris v. Virginia Power Co.Richmond County Circuit Court · 1987
  3. Simon v. MarlowDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API