Legal Opinion
Claudio v. United States
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided February 2, 1993No. 92-495-CIV-5-FPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES C. FOX, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on motion by defendants, Steven S. Grant (Grant) and David H. Jameson (Jameson) for partial judgment on the pleadings or, in the alternative, for partial summary judgment. The court already has ruled on defendants’ contention that they were not effectively served with process in their individual capacities; the issue now before the court is whether defendants are entitled to qualified immunity from this suit. Plaintiff has responded, and a reply has been filed. The matter is ripe for disposition.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sammartano v. First Judicial District Court, in and for the County of Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Berner v. DelahantyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Timothy T. Ryan, Jr. v. County of Dupage, and Sheriff Richard P. Doria and Deputy Sheriff Miller, Individually and in Their Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Griffin v. Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Kelly v. Municipal Court of Marion CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.