Hulet v. Wishkah Boom Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered July 2, 1908, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, enjoining the maintenance of obstructions placed in a navigable river, ordering the removal thereof, and awarding damages, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
Action by Charles H. Hulet and Maggie Hulet, his wife, against the Wishkah Boom Company, a corporation, to enjoin the defendant from so operating its splash dams and boom as to obstruct navigation of the Wishkah river and injure respondents’ lands, and to recover damages. From a judgment and decree granting an injunction and awarding damages, the defendant has appealed.
The case comes to this court on the pleadings, and the findings made by the trial court. The assignments of error present the single question whether the respondents are entitled to the injunctive relief, and the damages…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eisenbach v. HatfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Ferry v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Smith v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Griffith v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Sultan Water & Power Co. v. Weyerhauser Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Port of Seattle v. Oregon & Washington RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- State v. SturtevantWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Bales v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Olsen v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1920