Legal Opinion
Meijer, Inc. v. Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 11, 2008No. Civil Action 05-2195 (CKK), 06-494(CKK), 06-795(CKK)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Currently before the Court are three antitrust cases filed by the direct purchasers (and certain assignees of direct purchasers) of Ovcon 35 (“Ovcon”), a brand-name oral contraceptive marketed by Warner Chilcott. 1 Plaintiffs allege that Defendant Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Barr”), a manufacturer of Ovcon, entered into an illegal agreement with Warner Chilcott to delay the market entry of Barr’s generic version of Ovcon in exchange for $20 million. 2 According to Plaintiffs, this agreement violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. Commission on Presidential DebatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- In Re Southeastern Milk Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2011
- Gross v. WrightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Walgreen Co. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- EuroTec Vertical Flight Solutions LLC v. Safran Helicopter EnginesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.