Legal Opinion
Sparshott v. Feld Entertainment, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 1, 2000No. CIV. A. 99-0551(JR)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERTSON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Shan and Morgan Sparshott assert federal and common law privacy violations stemming from defendants’ alleged wiretapping and video surveillance of their activities at home and at work, by and through the actions of a former senior officer and director of Feld Entertainment, Inc. Before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss all claims against Feld’s wholly-owned subsidiary Sells-Floto, to dismiss the claims of conspiracy and intentional infliction of emotional distress against Feld and to transfer the remainder of the case to the Eastern…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Russo v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Margot Rendall-Speranza v. Edward A. NassimCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Hechler Chevrolet, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Kenneth Adams v. Terrel H. Bell, Individually, and as Secretary of the Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Perk v. Vector Resources Group, Ltd.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Intelect Corporation v. Cellco Partnership GpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Stith v. Chadbourne & Parke, LLP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Alberts v. Gallagher (In re Greater Southeast Community Hospital Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Abbey v. Modern Africa One, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Gipson v. Wells Fargo Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005