Legal Opinion

In re: Samuel R. Pierce, Jr. (Sanders Fee Application)

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 21, 1999No. 89-0005PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This matter coming to be heard and being heard before the Special Division of the Court upon the petition of R. Carter Sanders for reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to section 593(f) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, as amended, 28 U.S.C. § 591 et seq. (1994), and it appearing to the court for the reasons set forth more fully in the opinion filed contemporaneously herewith that the petition is not well taken, it is hereby

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the petition of R. Carter Sanders for attorneys’ fees he incurred during the investigation by Independent…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re Theodore B. OLSONCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  2. In Re Oliver L. North (Bush Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  3. In Re Raymond J. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  4. In Re Oliver L. North (Dutton Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  5. In Re Edwin Meese IIICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. In RE: BRUCE EDWARD BABBITT (Babbitt Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  3. In Re Samuel R. PIERCE, Jr. (Pierce Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  4. In Re Samuel R. PIERCE, Jr. (Seligman Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  5. In Re: Alphonso Michael "Mike" EspyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API