Legal Opinion

Krause v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Maxwell, J., presiding.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 99 Mich. 461.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This case was before us at the January term, 1894. 99 Mich. 461. Upon the second trial plaintiff recovered. The case was submitted to the jury, with the instruction that if they should find that the first policy was surrendered under an agreement to change the beneficiary, and that agreement was carried out and the change effected, the plaintiff could not recover, but that, if this agreement was not carried out, the plaintiff was entitled to recover. After the writing of the letter found in the former opinion, plaintiff wrote two other letters to the agent of the company at Detroit, demanding…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Krause v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rousseau v. Brotherhood of American YeomenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Waldbauer v. Michigan Bean Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Henning v. Riegler Water Well Drilling, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Reichert v. Negaunee State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Krause v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API