Legal Opinion

Rousseau v. Brotherhood of American Yeomen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1912No. Docket No. 99PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Case-made from Delta; Flannigan, J. Assumpsit by Eva Rousseau against the Brotherhood of American Yeomen on a benefit certificate. Judgment for plaintiff on a directed verdict. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

The beneficiary in a policy or certificate of life insurance issued by defendant to one Frank L. Rousseau brought suit thereon. With its plea the defendant gave notice that it would prove in its defense, among other things, that when the insured died the said policy was not in force and had been canceled for nonpayment of dues; that at the time of his death the said Frank L. Rousseau was not a member in good standing of defendant organization and had not complied with the agreements, conditions, and covenants in said policy contained. At the trial the court directed a verdict for plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bodine v. . Exchange Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Wallace v. Fraternal Mystic CircleMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Brennan v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Connor v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Great Camp Knights of the Maccabees v. SavageMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. National Bank of Colchester v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Rousseau v. Brotherhood of American YeomenMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. People ex rel. Reinhart v. HerrinIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Waldbauer v. Michigan Bean Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API