Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Clinton. (Daboll, J.) Motion to vacate an award. Order granting same set aside, and judgment entered in favor of plaintiff and appellant. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The defendant Warren Smith, being the owner of certain lands, leased the same to the plaintiff for the term of five years. Defendant Mary signed the lease as his wife. Disputes arose between them, which they submitted to arbitration, under chapter 292 of HowelFs Statutes. By the terms of the submission the arbitrators were to determine “all damages either party may have sustained by the failure of the other party to comply with the lease, and all damages either may sustain by reason of the giving up of the lease.” Mr. Taylor was to surrender the premises and all crops at such time as the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jone v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ames Canning Co. v. Dexter Seed Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  2. Smith v. Highland Park Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. 3 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1137, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7549 Robert F. Newman v. Avco Corporation-Aerospace Structures Division, Nashville, Tennessee, and International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Aero Lodge No. 735, Nashville, Tennessee, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  4. Krause v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Newman v. Avco Corporation-Aerospace Structures DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API