Legal Opinion
Timpson v. Marshall, Meadows & Stewart, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1950PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtSearl, J.
One motion is made in behalf of defendant Marshall, Meadows & Stewart, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the manufacturer, for dismissal of the amended complaint (Buies Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 5) and for an order striking out paragraphs 5, 9, 15, 18 and 20 of the amended complaint (rule 103).
The second motion made by Benjamin and White, hereinafter referred to as the retailers, likewise moves for an order dismissing the amended complaint so far as Edgar M. Timpson is concerned, also' under rule 106, and for an order striking out the paragraphs above referred to under rule 103.
A third…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Friedman v. L. M. Beck & Galilee Fish Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Architector Co. v. SlomonNew York Supreme Court · 1948
- Morris Run Coal Co. v. Carthage Sulphite Pulp & Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Cook v. A. Garside & Sons, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marguerite Jamieson v. Woodward & LothropCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957