Legal Opinion

Miller v. Bank of New York Mellon

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 2016No. Court of Appeals 15CA0467PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JUDGE TAUBMAN

T1 In this case involving dual tracking, a process where banks pursue foreclosure on a home while negotiating a loan modification, plaintiffs, Judith Z. and Thomas C. Miller (the Millers), filed claims against five financial institutions (collectively the Banks) 1 The Millers contend that the Banks improperly subjected them to dual tracking in violation of the consent judgment that resulted from the National Mortgage Settlement generally prohibiting dual tracking, as discussed below. The district court dismissed their complaint for failure to state a claim for relief,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Town of Alma v. AZCO Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  4. Captain Stewart W. Beckett v. Air Line Pilots AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  5. Berger v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sheen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. 96 Blooming Terrace No. 1, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Mayotte v. U.S. BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  4. ADA-ES, Inc. v. Big Rivers Electric CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
  5. Forefront Dermatology SC v. Tyler O. VukmerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API