Legal Opinion
Watson v. Malcom
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided December 29, 1951No. A-6938PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed a -motion to suppress interrogatories propounded -by the defendants upon the grounds that the interrogatories are oppressive and unfair; that unnecessary questions the answers to which are not admissible in evidence are asked; that the questions propounded are substantially the equivalent of taking a deposition; and that the plaintiff is out of the Territory.
In his brief plaintiff relies in part on the following cases: Checker Cab Mfg. Corporation v. Checker Taxi Co., D.C. Mass.1942, 2 F.R.D. 547; Stewart-Warner Corporation v. Staley, D.C.Pa.1941, 2…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coca Cola Co. v. Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1939
- Chenault v. Nebraska Farm Products, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1949
- Stewart-Warner Corp. v. StaleyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
- Borgen v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
3Cited by1 opinion
- Daniel J. McDougall Jr. v. Kenneth R. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972