Legal Opinion

Murray v. Meteor

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 4, 1949No. , A-18886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

This cause may be deemed a second in-stalment of the litigation reported under a similar title in D.C., 78 F.Supp. 637. The libellant seeks to impress upon a stipulation for value given May 27, 1948, a preferred claim for wharfage from October 7, 1947, to May 31, 1948, and from June 2, 1948, to July 1, 1948; the stipulation was filed on the latter day. During this entire period the vessel was not under attachment on October 8, 1947, or from May 28, 1948, to and including June 21, 1948, or 25 days in all.

The claim is resisted on all grounds presented in the prior case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New York Dock Co. v. Steamship PoznanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Larsen v. New York Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. Murray v. MeteorDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Murray v. MeteorDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1950
  2. Stephens Boat Co. v. The Barge "ORR 1"District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API