Legal Opinion

Murray v. Meteor

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 12, 1948No. 18591PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

This cause was heard pursuant to an order made in response to a motion to vacate the attachment of the S. S. Meteor, and to dismiss the libel "on the ground that the subject-matter is outside the maritime and admiralty jurisdiction of this Court”. The order inter alia directed that the cause be placed on the day calendar of the admiralty term for the purpose of presenting the jurisdictional question; “and if a trial is necessary on the other issues, a trial date be fixed therefor”.

The controversy is whether the libellant is entitled to a lien for wharfage of the Meteor…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The LottawannaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Just v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. The J. E. RumbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. The PoznanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Buck Kreihs Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  2. Robert E. Blake Inc. v. Excel EnvironmentalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Murray v. MeteorDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1949
  4. In re Ba Bas Barge, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Robert E. Blake Inc. v. Excel EnvironmentalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API