Larsen v. New York Dock Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
In New York Dock Co. v. S. S. Poznan, 274 U.S. 117, 47 S.Ct. 482, 71 L.Ed. 955, the Court held, in effect, that no lien can be obtained against a ship in custodia legis; but it allowed the Dock Company a preferential claim against the proceeds of the ship for wharfage service rendered while the libel proceedings were pending, because the service was furnished as an incident of the court’s administration and had benefited the parties to the proceedings. Such a payment, said the Supreme Court, defrayed an expense which the admiralty court “has permitted for the common…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Galveston Railroad v. CowdreySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- New York Dock Co. v. Steamship PoznanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. SpillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- W. A. Marshall & Co. v. S. S. "President Arthur"Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In the Matter of Chicago Express, Incorporated, Bankrupt. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Chicago Express, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- In Re American Anthracite & Bituminous Coal Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Bassis v. Universal Line, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- In Re Chicago Express, IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- City of Erie v. S. S. North AmericanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.