Legal Opinion
Crumpacker v. Kansas, Department of Human Resources
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 8, 2003No. 02-3197PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Jill Crumpacker, filed this suit against her former employer, the State of Kansas (the “State”), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17, alleging gender discrimination and retaliation. The State moved for summary judgment, arguing, in part, that it was immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. The district court granted the State’s motion as to one of Crumpacker’s retaliation claims and denied the State’s motion as to the remaining claims. The State filed an interlocutory appeal of the Eleventh…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Doebele v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Hertz v. Luzenac America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Sheila E. Peterson v. Scott County Scott County Sheriff's Department William J. Nevin, Sheriff Tom Helmrich, Jail AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Hansen v. SkyWest AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Reznik v. inContactCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.