Legal Opinion

Sterling, Winchester & Long, LLC v. Loyd

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 2006No. A06A0990PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Presiding Judge.

Sterling, Winchester & Long, LLC (“the LLC”) appeals from the trial court’s order entering a default judgment against it. The LLC asserts the trial court erred by striking its pro se answer based on the trial court’s conclusion that an LLC must be represented by counsel, by failing to give it an opportunity to hire counsel and file an amended answer, and by failing to hold an evidentiary hearing on the amount of damages owed. Finding no merit in these enumerations, we affirm.

1. The LLC contends that the Supreme Court’s requirement that corporations be represented by an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Eckles v. Atlanta Technology Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. Winzer v. EHCA DUNWOODY, LLC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Findley v. FindleySupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  5. Hazlett & Hancock Construction Co. v. Virgil Womack Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cameron v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Odion v. Avesis, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  3. Harbolt v. PelletierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. In re Estate of CoutermarshCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. American Benefit Corp. v. Parking Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API