Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Mason

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1996No. B093404PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.

Application of the res judicata principle compels affirmance of the trial court’s postjudgment order denying Raymond L. Mason’s (husband) motion to adjudicate an alleged “omitted” asset. We impose attorney fees for this frivolous appeal. (Fam. Code, § 271.) Hopefully, this published opinion will deter husband and others from bringing repetitive challenges to the trial court’s orders.

On March 26, 1993, husband and Marjorie Mason (wife) agreed to dissolve their marriage. Wife, age 65, operated a residential care facility, the Mason Home Care Facility, at home and closed the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Henn v. HennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re Marriage of MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. In Re Marriage of BidermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. In Re Marriage of CrookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edlund v. HalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. In Re Marriage of FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API