Legal Opinion

Kirby v. Horne Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 8, 1988No. 1086PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

James E. Kirby filed a complaint against Horne Motor Company and Ford Motor Credit Company alleging conversion and violation of the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act. The trial judge granted directed verdicts for Horne and Ford Motor Credit on both causes of action. Kirby appeals. We affirm.

In ruling on a motion for directed verdict, the trial court is required to view the evidence and the inferences which can reasonably be drawn from the evidence in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion. The motion should be denied if the evidence yields more than…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Castell v. Stephenson Finance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  2. Bonaparte v. FloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Jordan v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  5. Johnson Cotton Co. v. CannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Regions Bank v. SchmauchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Moore v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  3. In re TD Bank, N.A.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
  4. McTeer v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1989
  5. MacKela v. BentleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API