Legal Opinion

Seamons v. ANDERSON

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1952No. 7691PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, justice.

This was an action for a money judgment upon a conditional sales contract covering the sale of a 1948 Mercury automobile. Trial was held before a judge with special interrogatories being submitted to an advisory jury. Since all of the parties counter- or cross-complained and cross-appealed from the judgment of the lower court, a rather detailed narration of facts is necessary.

Ray Bitters and Clayton Nielsen sold automobiles obtained on a consignment basis under the trade name and style of Valley Car Market. Whether their relationship was one of partnership or employer and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jensen v. GerrardUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Norback v. Board of Directors of Church Extension Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Buckley v. COXUtah Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Armed Forces Insurance Exchange v. HarrisonUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Blackham v. SnelgroveUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Pasker, Gould, Ames & Weaver, Inc. v. MorseCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  4. Hallstrom v. BuhlerUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Pritchett v. EQUITABLE LIFE AND CASUALTY INS. CO.Utah Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API