Legal Opinion
Rubenstein v. Gap, Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided August 24, 2017No. B272356PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLui, J.
*873Plaintiff and appellant Linda Rubenstein appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court sustained the demurrer of defendant and respondent The Gap, Inc. (Gap) without leave to amend. The trial court found that Rubenstein could not state claims under our state's Unfair Competition Law (UCL), Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq. ; False Advertising Law (FAL), Business and Professions Code section 17500 et seq. ; or Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), Civil Code section 1750 et seq., because she failed to allege a misrepresentation or an actionable omission on the part of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Daugherty v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Robert Hodsdon v. Mars, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Gutierrez v. Carmax Auto Superstores Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Copart, Inc. v. Sparta Consulting, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Michael Terpin v. at and T Mobility LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Broken Drum Bar, Inc. v. Site Centers Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.