Legal Opinion
Morningstar Water Users Ass'n v. Farmington Municipal School District No. 5
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided July 25, 1995No. 21351PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROST, Justice.
Farmington Municipal School District No. 5 (School District) entered contracts with the City of Farmington for the provision of water services. Morningstar Water Users Association, Inc. appeals from the district court’s refusal to enjoin these contracts. Mornings-tar argues that the contracts for the water services should have been submitted for competitive bid under the provisions of the New Mexico Procurement Code, NMSA1978, §§ 13-1-28 to -199 (Repl.Pamp.1992). 1 We find no violation of the Code and affirm the trial court.
I. Facts.
Farmington is located in the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Reeves, Inc. v. StakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Springfield v. ClouseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Morningstar Water Users Ass'n v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Morningstar Water Users Ass'n v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Diversey Corp. v. Chem-Source Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- City of Albuquerque v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Halwood v. Cowboy Auto Sales, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Diana Crouch v. City of Kansas City, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.