Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 1, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Fayette county; the Hon. Albebt M. Rose, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harris

Abstract of the Decision. Attorney and client, § 134*—upon whom notice for attorney’s lien must he served. Section 55, ch. 83, Hurd’s R. S. J. & A. ¶ 611, providing that notice for attorney’s lien shall be -served upon the party against whom the attorney’s client may have suit, means that the notice must be personally served on the party against whom summons would issue, and the personal service of such notice should follow the law as to service of process where the party is a corporation.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cazalet v. CazaletAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
  2. Mayer v. Yellow Cab Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1927
  3. Reynolds v. Alton, Granite & St. Louis Traction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1918
  4. Moore v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927