Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Yellow Cab Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 21, 1927No. Gen. No. 31,791PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom

The case at bar is a proceeding to enforce petitioners’ claim against defendant under the Attorney’s Lien Act, Cahill’s St. ch. 13, ¶ 13; section 14, chapter 13, Smith-Hurd Illinois Revised Statutes 1925. That section reads:

“That attorneys at law shall have a lien upon all claims, demands and causes of action, including all claims for unliquidated damages, which may be placed in their hands by their clients for suit or collection, or upon which suit or action has been instituted, for the amount of any fee which may have been agreed upon by and between such attorneys and their clients, or, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haj v. American Bottle Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Carney v. TullyIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Wilson v. LowmasterIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Reynolds v. Alton, Granite & St. Louis Traction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cazalet v. CazaletAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
  2. Passer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. Hall v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  4. Coyle v. Velie Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  5. Berkemeier v. Dormuralt Motor Sales, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API