Legal Opinion

Turner v. Rogers

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1856PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtG-ookins, J.

Rogers and Sherlock brought this action against Turner, as indorser of three promissory notes, executed and payable in Ohio, and protested at maturity for non-payment. A statute of Ohio is set out in the complaint, making promissory notes negotiable, and giving the indorsee a right of action against the indorser, upon demand of payment at maturity, and notice of dishonor.

The defendant answered by a general traverse.

Trial by the Court. Finding for the plaintiffs for the amount of the notes. New trial refused, and judgment.

The plaintiffs’ evidence consisted of the notes with their'indorsements;…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shanklin v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Dumont v. PopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
  3. Fisher v. State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peabody Ins. v. Wilson & BeasleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Swayze v. BrittonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Legg v. VinalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  4. Brown v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. First National Bank v. German BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API