Legal Opinion
Ameron, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 28, 1985No. Civ. 85-1064PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge.
On March 27, 1985 I ruled on the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction in this matter holding that although the Army Corps’ decision to reject Ameron’s bid was unreviewable, the Army Corps must hold up all work on the contract until the Comptroller General had reviewed Ameron’s protest in accordance with the Competition and Contracting Act (CICA) Public Law No. 98-369, 98 Stat. 494 (1984), which I found to be constitutional, 607 F.Supp. 962.
Since my ruling the Comptroller General has reviewed plaintiff’s protest pursuant to CICA provision 31…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- D.D. v. M.T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Burns v. DailyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- United States ex rel. Bergen v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Ameron, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps Of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Di Loreto v. CostiganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.