Legal Opinion

Tocco v. Richman Greer Professional Ass'n

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 17, 2012No. Case No. 11-10310PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [47]

NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge.

From 1998 through 2008, Plaintiff Sam Tocco gave millions of dollars to Joseph *497Zada, either as loans or for investments, and it is undisputed that Zada still owes Tocco approximately $5 million.. (Defs.’ Exs. 13, Pl.’s Ans. to Interrog. No. 2; Ex. 33, Prom. Notes and Debt Acknowledgment Form.) It is also undisputed that some of the money that Tocco gave to Zada for- investments was money Tocco had borrowed from his friends and family, including his mother, father, ■ grandfather and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hi-Way Motor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McBroom v. ChildUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. General Retirement System v. Dixon (In re Dixon)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
  3. Dugan v. VlckoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  4. Galeana Telecommunications Investments, Inc. v. Amerifone Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
  5. Thomas Dailey v. Lisa MedlockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API