Legal Opinion

Department of Revenue v. Roe

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 19, 1990No. 90-P-71PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A child was born out of wedlock on March 23, 1980. On November 21, 1986, the mother filed a civil complaint under G. L. c. 209C in the District Court alleging that the defendant was the father of the child. After hearing, a judge found paternity and, pursuant to G. L. c. 209C, § 9, ordered the father to pay the mother $63,975 for retroactive support of the child at the rate of $143.76 per week from the date of her birth, to pay the same weekly rate for the child’s current support, and to add the child to his medical insurance plan. Paternity is not in issue on appeal, only the financial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gomez v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Klein v. CatalanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Leigh v. Board of Registration in NursingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. Fennell v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State, Department of Health & Human Resources Ex Rel. Robert Michael B. v. Robert Morris N.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Caylor-Nickel Clinic, P.C. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1991
  3. Rosenberg v. MeridaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Department of Revenue v. Mason M.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  5. W.M. v. D.S.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API