Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Goldstone v. County of Santa Cruz

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 17, 2012No. H036273PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, J.

Appellant Paul Goldstone, as trustee of the Trust U.T.D. June 27, 2003 (Goldstone), appeals from a judgment entered on his petition for writ of administrative mandamus, which sought to overturn the decision of the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors denying an application to convert the Alimur Mobilehome Park (Alimur) from rental to condominium ownership. That petition was opposed in the trial court by respondent County of Santa Cruz (County) and intervener Alimur Park Homeowners Association (HOA).

On appeal, Goldstone contends that County exceeded its authority under…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Avidor v. Sutter's Place, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Chino MHC v. City of ChinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. 218 Properties, LLC v. City of CarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. 218 Properties, LLC v. City of CarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. 218 Properties, LLC v. City of CarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API