Legal Opinion
Avidor v. Sutter's Place, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 23, 2013No. H037142PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
Plaintiff Haim Avidor (plaintiff) is the lead plaintiff in this class action by current and former card dealers employed by defendant Sutter’s Place, Inc., doing business as Bay 101 (often abbreviated by the parties as Bay 101 or the casino), which operated a cardroom in San Jose. Bay 101 required its dealers to contribute a set amount of the gratuities they received from players to a common account, which was distributed to other casino employees each payday. In this action plaintiff has contended that Bay 101 violated Labor Code section 351 by compelling its dealers to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- McBride v. BoughtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Industrial Welfare Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hanover Insurance v. Fremont BankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- English & Sons, Inc. v. Straw Hat Restaurants, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- (PS) Quantum Capital Funding Corporation v. PDI Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
- 7EDU Impact Academy Inc. v. YouDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Aimsley Enterprises Inc. v. MerrymanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.