Legal Opinion

Police Pension Board for City of Tucson v. Denney

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1958No. 6417PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Chief Justice.

This action, brought by a retired policeman, involves the constitutionality of an amendment to a Police Pension Act. The trial court invalidated one part of the amendment as being void as to plaintiff. This appeal followed.

There is no dispute as to the facts which, together with certain pertinent provisions of law, in substance are as follows: In the year 1933 Paul G. Denney, plaintiff-appellee (hereinafter termed plaintiff) became a member of the police department of the city of Tucson. Thereafter the legislature of Arizona adopted the Police Pension Act of 1937, Ch. 40,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southwest Engineering Co. v. ErnstArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Schrey v. Allison Steel Mfg. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Yeazell v. CopinsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Police Pension Board of City of Phoenix v. WarrenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension & Retirement System v. KernSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Robinson v. Police Pension BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Payne v. KnoxArizona Supreme Court · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API