Black River and Utica Railroad Company v. . Clarke
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The motion for a nonsuit was made upon the single ground that it was not proved that the plaintiff was a corporation. The subscription book introduced and proved, signed by the defendant, distinctly recites and declares the formation and existence of a corporation organized under the general railroad act, "under the corporate name of the Black River and Utica Railroad Company," and that the articles of association, and the necessary affidavits showing due compliance with the law, had been duly filed. This must be sufficient proof of the corporate character of the plaintiff as against the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Welland Canal Co. v. HathawayNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Dutchess Cotton Manufactory v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1817
- Steam Navigation Co. v. WeedNew York Supreme Court · 1853
- Palmer v. LawrenceThe Superior Court of New York City · 1849
3Cited by19 opinions
- New York & Oswego Midland Railroad v. Van HornNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Brown v. Scottish-American Mortgage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Pittsburgh, Wheeling & Kentucky R. R. v. ApplegateWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
- United Growers Co. v. EisnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- People v. Albany and Susquehanna RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1869
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.