Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Darnell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 26, 1952No. 4-9819PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The issue here is whether appellant or appellee is entitled to the office of municipal judge of Hot Springs. On the 5th day of April, 1949, appellant Johnson was elected to the office for the term of four years under Act 2 of 1917 and amendments thereto. By Act 145 of 1949 the salary of the municipal judge was substantially increased, and the Act provided for an election to that office for a term of four years to be held at the next regular biennial general election of state, district, county, and township officers. At an election held in pursuance to this Act, appellee Darnell was elected…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lawyer v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  2. Faver v. GoldenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Gross v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Terry, County Judge v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  5. Goggin v. RatchfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jones v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Williams v. Pulaski County Election Comm'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. Jones v. DuckettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  4. Acme Brick Co. v. ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COM'NSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  5. Crain v. FosterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API