Crain v. Foster
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.
The facts are complicated and require some detailing; but, once understood, the result is clear. The question posed is whether Appellee Foster owned an undivided one-tenth interest (as a tenant in common) in a tract of 1,000 acres, or owned 100 acres in severalty. We conclude that appellee owned 100 acres in severalty; and we rest our opinion on the rule of equitable estoppel.
Ike Jermany owned about 1,000 acres in Columbia County 1 , and died intestate prior to 1941. Z. W. Jermany, as one of the heirs of Ike Jermany, inherited an undivided one-tenth interest…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Arthur v. IsraelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Johnson v. DarnellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- State of Tennessee v. BartonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Sisk v. AlmonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
- City of Bentonville v. BrowneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dupwe v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Henry Law Firm v. Adel AtallaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Mason v. Urban Renewal of North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Tapp v. TappMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.