Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Quaker City Cabs, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1932No. Appeal, 23PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Frazer,

Appellant is defendant in an action of trespass to recover damages for injuries received by plaintiffs while passengers in one of the cabs of defendant company. The statement of claim, together with notice to file an affidavit of defense, was filed July 28, 1930. In accordance with the provisions of the Act of April 10, 1929, P. L. 479, defendant, on February 2, 1932, caused a writ of scire facias to issue to bring the City of Philadelphia and the Philadelphia Steam Heating Company upon the record as additional defendants. By rule No. 226-d of the Court of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vinnacombe v. Phila. Am. S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. First Nat. Bk. of Pittsburgh v. BairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Equipment Corp. of America v. Primos Vanadium Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Flisher v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  5. Timney v. TimneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McCaulif v. GriffithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Smith v. Ellwood City Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Cummings v. A. F. Rees, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Timlin v. Scranton (No. 2)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Snedaker & Co. v. Wayne Title & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API