Legal Opinion
DeJoy v. Comcast Cable Communications Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 21, 1997No. Civil Action 96-1135 (AJL)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
This is an action by Frank DeJoy (“DeJoy”) against Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. (“Comcast Cable”), Suburban Cablevision (“Suburban Cablevision”), Comcast Cable of New Jersey, Thomas Baxter (“Baxter”) and Michael Doyle (“Doyle”) (collectively, the “Defendants”). The amended complaint (the “Amended Complaint”), filed 28 June 1996, asserts claims pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (the “ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (the…
2Cases cited93 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sifre v. Department of HealthDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999
- Svarnas v. AT & T COMMUNICATIONSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Kennedy v. Chubb Group of Ins. CompaniesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Pepe v. Rival Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Ferraro v. Bell Atlantic Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.