Legal Opinion

Holland v. American Coal Co., Inc.

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided November 14, 1994No. Civ. A. 1:93-0995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FABER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are the Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Fund (“Combined Fund”). Plaintiffs filed the above-styled action in this court on October 20, 1993, pursuant to the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1992, 26 U.S.C. §§ 9701, et seq. (the “Coal Act”), seeking to recover, on behalf of the Combined Fund, delinquent contributions owed by American Coal Company, Inc. (“American Coal”) under section 9704(i)(1)(A) of the Coal Act. On May 6, 1994, plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment against American Coal.

Defen…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Barrick Gold Exploration, Inc. v. HudsonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holland v. Double G Coal Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
  2. Carbon Fuel Co. v. USX Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
  3. Holland v. Cardiff Coal Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1997
  4. In Re Olga Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Holland v. Kitchekan Fuel Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API