Legal Opinion

Rotberg v. Dodwell & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 27, 1945No. 61PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

This is an action to recover refunds or rebates of import duties which the defendant importer received from the United States after a determination by the Customs Court that dogskins of the type purchased by plaintiffs from defendant were free from duties under the Tariff Act of 1930. Plaintiffs had been buying skins from defendant for some time, but all of the rebates here claimed arpse in connection with six purchases made between October 30, 1930, and August 30, 1932. Five of the purchases were made pursuant to written contracts, each executed on defendant’s printed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Engl v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Thorington v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. West v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Madeirense Do Brasil S/A v. Stulman-Emrick Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  5. Nahtel Corporation v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jernigan v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Chubb v. Amax Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Schine v. SchineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  4. Blockston v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
  5. United States v. Lennox Metal Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API