Legal Opinion

United States v. Lennox Metal Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 1, 1955No. 280, Docket 23451PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

The trial judge found that, when the government notified defendant of the termination of the contract, defendant was not in default. The evidence amply supports that finding.

The original contract set forth no delivery schedule. Supplemental Agreement No. 1 provided for deliveries starting on or before July 31, 1951. Supplemental Agreement No. 2 dated January 31, 1952, states that “it has been administratively determined that the Contractor was excusably delayed from 1 Sep*307tember 1951, by reason of unforeseeable delays in delivery of materiel and by reason of acts of the…

2Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. United States v. HutchesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. WosepkaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. People v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Dvorkin v. Township of DoverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  4. Bedrock Foundations, Inc. v. Geo. H. Brewster & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  5. Northern California Power Agency v. MortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API