Legal Opinion

Thompson v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1934No. 9703PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. It is declared in the Penal Code, § 416: “Any person who shall pursue his business or the work of his ordinary calling on the Lord’s day, works of necessity or charity only excepted, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.” Where the business or work of ordinary calling of a person is that of manager of a moving-picture theatre, such employment is not ordinarily a “work of necessity” within the meaning of that Code section. The case differs on its facts from Williams v. State, 167 Ga. 160 (144 S. E. 745), in which it was held: “In the light of modern-day methods of traveling by automobile,' the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Academy v. BohlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  3. Albany Theatre Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Trust Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. Hicks v. City of DublinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  5. Forehand v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API