Legal Opinion
Rogers v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 9, 1939No. 27589PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
Tlie defendants, Rogers, Brewster, and Heager, were convicted of pursuing their business or work of their ordinary calling on the Lord’s day, the same not being a work of necessity or charity. They moved for a new trial, which was refused, and they excepted. Omitting the formal parts, the indictment charged the offense of misdemeanor, “for that the said C. H. Rogers, M.. R. Brewster, and J. R. Heager, in the county aforesaid, on the 6th day of September in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and thirty-eight, unlawfully and with force' and arms did pursue their business and work of their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bucher v. Cheshire RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Trustees of the Academy v. BohlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Bucher v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Hennington v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Crook v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Epstein v. MaddoxDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1967
- Forehand v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Mosko v. DunbarSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.