Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ingram

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 2007PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

POPOVICH, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant Wyatt R. Ingram appeals the judgment of sentence entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County, following his conviction for one count of *472cruelty to animals,1 which stemmed from his killing of a dog on his property. On appeal, Appellant claims the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction because he was authorized by statute to kill the dog and, alternatively, because the Commonwealth failed to prove that he killed the dog with malice. Upon review, we affirm.

¶2 The relevant facts and procedural history of this case are as follows:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DiStefanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. HackenbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. HackenbergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. SpeaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RushSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. CrawfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Com. v. Miller, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Com. v. Morales, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Com. v. Vidra, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API