Legal Opinion

Kathryn Price v. Medicaid Director

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 30, 2016No. 15-4066PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge.

OPINION

Ohio offers assisted-living coverage to its Medicaid beneficiaries on a prospective basis. The plaintiffs here, a class of Ohio Medicaid beneficiaries, sued Ohio’s Medicaid administrators on the claim that federal law requires Ohio to cover certain assisted-living services retrospectively. The district court granted summary judgment to the plaintiffs. We reverse.

I

A

In 1965, Congress used its Spending Clause power to establish Medicaid. See U.S. Const, art. I, § 8, cl. 1. Through Medicaid, the federal government gives money to the States for the purpose of paying…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Jane Doe v. Michael DeWineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. Blanche Barber v. Charter Twp. of Springfield, Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  3. Charles Gresham v. Alex Azar, IICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  4. T.M. v. Richard DeWineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  5. Mitchell ex rel. Mitchell v. Community Mental Health of Central MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API