Jane Doe v. Michael DeWine
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HELENE N. WHITE, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-Appellants Michael DeWine, Ohio Attorney General, and Tom Stickrath, Superintendent of the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation, appeal the district-court judgment declaring that Ohio's sexual-offender registration and notification laws violate Plaintiff-Appellee Jane Doe's procedural due process rights because they subject her to lifetime registration requirements, which rest on an implicit finding that she remains likely to reoffend, without an opportunity to rebut that finding. We REVERSE .
I. BACKGROUND
In 2006, Doe pleaded guilty to unlawful…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Karen McNeil v. Cmty. Probation Servs.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Matsumoto v. LabradorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- John Doe v. RauschDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2019
- John Doe 1 v. William LeeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- T.M. v. Richard DeWineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.