Palmer v. Breen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Wilkin, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtBerrv, J.
On March 1, 1883, defendants entered into a written agreement, with plaintiff, whereby they bound themselves to furnish him “5,280 lineal feet of granite curbing, the same to be in accordance with the plans and specifications for the same in the office of the city engineer of the city of St. Paul, * * * for eighty-five cents per lineal foot; * * * payments to be made monthly, or as often as estimates are made, for all curb delivered, and final payment to be made in thirty days after the last of said curb is delivered.” No time was specified for delivering the curbing, and so the trial court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robson v. BohnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Roberts v. Mazeppa Mill Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Robson v. BohnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
3Cited by9 opinions
- Colt v. . KimballSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Liljengren Furniture & Lumber Co. v. MeadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- West v. BechtelMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Day v. GravelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- J. B. Colt Co. v. KimballSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.