Legal Opinion
Sweeney v. American Registry of Pathology
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 29, 2003No. CIV.A. 00-2390PLFPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
The Court has before it defendant United States’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Upon consideration of defendant’s motion, plaintiffs’ opposition and defendant’s reply, the Court concludes that the motion to dismiss must be denied. The Court also has before it plaintiffs’ cross-motion to strike the defense that the amount recoverable against the United States is capped at $1,650,000.00. Upon consideration of plaintiffs’ motion and defendant’s opposition, the Court concludes that the motion to strike must…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Franco v. National Capital Revitalization Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Entergy Nuclear Fitzpatrick, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Tsaknis v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.