Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Lasby

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1932No. 7,041PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

After the decision of this court in the case of Burgess v. Lasby, 91 Mont. 482, 9 Pac. (2d) 164, Marie and W. D. Lasby filed in the district court an amended and supplemental motion to vacate the order appointing the receiver. After hearing in the district court, the Honorable O. F. Goddard presiding, the motion was granted on August 24, 1932, and the order, in addition to vacating the order appointing the receiver, directed the clerk of the court to whom the receiver had theretofore, under order of the court, paid the money accumulated by him, amounting to $8,397.60, to pay to the receiver…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burgess v. LasbyMontana Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burgess v. LasbyMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Burgess v. HooksMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Union B. T. Co. v. State Bk. of TownsendMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. In re LasbyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API