Legal Opinion

Nickel v. Theresa Farmers Co-Operative Asso.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1945PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The question upon which the affirmance of the judgment on the counterclaim depends is whether on September 6, 1941,.' plaintiff promised to supply all the lumber needed for defendant’s building at the prices quoted. There is sufficient evidence to sustain the finding that there was a subsequent delivery and acceptance by the defendant of a quantity of lumber at the prices quoted on September 6, 1941, so that the alleged oral contract of September 6th is taken out of the statute of frauds by partial delivery, sec. 121.04, Stats. Unless there was concluded an'actual agree-' ment between the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. United Parcel Service v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. State v. DanielsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Lincoln v. Erie Preserving Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  5. Buckberg v. Washburn-Crosby Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Earl M. Jorgensen Co. v. Mark Construction, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Linear Technology Corporation v. Micrel, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. Rich Products Corp. v. Kemutec, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999
  4. Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Wallace v. MantheiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API